She does "not agree with all-male leaderships" because men "cannot be left to run things on their own" she told the Sunday Times.She'd have a go at me if I said "women cannot be left to run things on their own". It seems this "equality" drive is now a drive for domination and blatant sexism left unchecked. If men are better for the job, so be it. If women are better, they get the job. Simple as that - merit. Trying to put women into roles just for the sake of balancing the sexes is pretty much saying that since women aren't good enough to take the job against men, they have to be given special treatment, and I wouldn't be surprised if more than a few women found that quite insulting.
Sunday, 2 August 2009
How does she get away with this?
Harriet Harman is back on her feminazi soapbox today.